为研究某水面舰船在一定风载荷作用下的操纵性特点，基于Matlab软件平台和模型试验，构建了静水和考虑风载荷作用下的三自由度MMG操纵性方程，对静水和风载荷作用下的操纵性进行数值预报。通过静水中数值预报结果与试验值的比较，发现仿真值与试验值吻合度较好，从而验证了该方法的可行性。将风载荷作用下的结果与静水中的数值预报结果进行对比分析，结果表明，无因次回转直径、无因次战术直径、速降、无因次横距等回转运动参数都要小于静水中预报值，回转角速度基本与静水预报值一致，无因次纵距要大于静水中的理论预报值；初转周期、超越时间、第一超越角以及第二超越角等Z形运动参数值都要大于静水中预报值，由此可知风载荷对该水面舰船的操纵性相较于静水具有明显的影响，同时该数值预报方法可为工程应用提供借鉴。
In order to study the maneuverability of a surface ship under the certain wind load, the three-degree-of-freedom MMG maneuverability equation under still water and wind load is constructed based on the Matlab software platform. It is found that the simulation value is in good agreement with the test value by comparing the results of the numerical forecast in the still water with the test value,which proves the feasibility of the method.The numerical calculation of the maneuverability under wind load is carried out and compared with the numerical results of still water. The results show that:The rotational angular parameters such as the dimensionless rotation diameter, the dimensionless tactical diameter, the velocity drop, the dimensionless transverse distance are smaller than the theoretical forecast value in the hydrostatic, and the rotational angular velocity is basically the same as the theoretical value of the hydrostatic theory, and the dimensionless longitudinal distance are greater than the theoretical forecast value in the hydrostatic. And the Z-shaped motion parameters such as the initial prediction period, the transcendental time, the first transcendental angle and the second transcendental angle are larger than those of the hydrostatic theoretical forecast value. It can be seen that the wind load has a maneuverability influence to the surface ship when compared with still water, and the numerical forecasting method can provide reference for engineering application.
2019,41(8): 48-54 收稿日期：2018-01-22
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2019.08.010
分类号：U662.3
作者简介：魏可可(1992-),男,博士研究生,专业方向为船舶与海洋结构物设计制造
参考文献：
[1] 朱齐丹, 于瑞亭, 夏桂华, 等. 风浪流干扰及参数不确定欠驱动船舶航迹跟踪的滑模鲁棒控制[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2007, 29(7):35-40
[2] 李美青, 吴秀恒. 船舶在风浪流及浅水域中多工况操纵运动模拟计算[J]. 中国造船, 1989:38-52.
[3] 田超. 风浪流作用下船舶操纵运动的仿真计算[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2003:55-70.
[4] 吉春正. 风浪流环境中滑行艇操纵性研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2007:58-71.
[5] TSUTOMU H, YAN L, YUTAKA H. Wind tunnel tests on a different phase three-stage savonius rotor[C]//JSME International Journal Series B Fluids and Thermal Engineering. 2005, 48(1):9-16.
[6] YOZO F, KICHIROK, HIROSHI T. Wind tunnel tests[J]. Wind Resistant Design of Bridges, 2012:89-118
[7] BAHAJ A, MOLLAND J, CHAPLIN W. Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank[J]. Renewable Energy, 2007, 32(3):407-726
[8] BAHAJ A, BATTEN G. Experimental verifications of numerical predictions for the hydrodynamic performance of horizontal axis marine current turbines[J]. Renewable Energy, 2007, 32(15):2479-2490
[9] FAHD F, CHRISTIAN K, ARJEN K. Predicting loads on LNG carrier with CFD[C]//Proceeding of the ASME 201029th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering(OMEA 2010-2012), Shanghai, 2010.
[10] POPINET S, SMITH M, STEVEN C. Experimental and numerical study of the turbulence characteristics of air flow around a research vessel[J]. Journal of Atmos-pheric and Oceanic Technology, 2004, 21(10):1575-1589
[11] BRIZZOLARA S, RIZZUTO E. Wind heeling moments on very large ships:Some insights through CFD results[C]//Proceeding of the 9th International Conference of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, Rio de Janeiro:Lamce Press, 2006:1-13.
[12] GUILHERME V, OLAF J W, HARALD O. Semiempirical predictions and CFD computation for current coefficients of semi-submersibles[C]//Proceeding of the 28th International Conference on Ocean Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, 2009.
[13] JAVAHERCHI T. Review of spalar all marasturbulance modle and its modifcations[D]. Washington:ME Department, University of Washington, 2010.
[14] XUE Y, KHARE M, CHAUDHRY K K. Wind tunnel simulation studies on dispersion at urban street canyons and insections:a review[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(9):697-717
[15] FUJIWARA T, YUKAWA K, SATO H, et al. Wind effect estimation in side by side offloading operation for FLNG and LNG carrier ships[C]//31st ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL, 2012:71-78.
[16] FUJIWARA T, YUKAWA K, SATO H. Wind Effect estimation and navigation-al effect in side by side offloading operation for FLNG and LNG carrier ships[C]//Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texa-s, USA, 2012:23-38.
[17] RAMAN-NAIR W, GASH R. Effect of wind and current on course control of a maneuvering vessel[C]//Oceans Conference, St Johns, CANADA, 2014:14-19.
[18] 王化明, 邹早健. 双桨双舵船舶操纵性预报研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2006, 30(1):124-127
