潜艇操纵性是潜艇重要的综合航行性能之一，随着计算机能力的提升及计算流体力学理论的进步，基于CFD技术的潜艇操纵性预报已成为当前的研究热点。本文在收集分析国内外潜艇操纵性预报相关文献资料的基础上，分别介绍基于CFD的潜艇操纵性间接预报方法和基于CFD的潜艇操纵性直接预报方法的特点，对近20年来基于CFD方法的潜艇操纵性预报研究的若干热点问题及进展情况进行总结及展望。
The maneuverability of submarine is one of the important comprehensive navigation performance of submarine. With the improvement of computer ability and the progress of CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), the prediction of maneuverability of submarine based on CFD technology has become the current research hotspot. Based on the collection and analysis of the literature about the prediction of submarine maneuverability at home and abroad, the characteristics of indirect prediction method and direct prediction method for submarine maneuverability based on CFD are discussed respectively in this paper. Some hot issues and progress of the research on the prediction of submarine maneuverability based on CFD in the past 20 years are summarized and prospected.
2020,42(5): 1-7 收稿日期：2020-01-18
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2020.05.001
分类号：U661.33
作者简介：柏铁朝(1984-),男,博士研究生,研究方向为船舶水动力数值计算
参考文献：
[1] The Manoeuvring Committee Final Report and Recommendations: 25th International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) [C]//2008.
[2] MARTIN Renilson. Submarine Hydrodynamics[M]. Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[3] MARSHALLSAY P.G., ERIKSSON A.M. Use of computational fluid dynamics as a tool to assess the hydrodynamic performance of a submarine[C]//18th Australasion Fluid Mechanics Conference, Launceston, Australia, 2012.
[4] 潘子英, 吴宝山, 沈泓萃. CFD在潜艇操纵性水动力工程预报中的应用研究[J]. 船舶力学, 2004, 8(5): 42–51
[5] STERN F, YANG Jianming, et al. Computational ship hydrodynamics: Nowadays and way forward[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2013, 60: 3–105
[6] WATT G.D, BAKER C.R, GERBER A.G. ANSYS CFX-10 RANS normal force predictions for the Series 58 Model 4621 unappended axisymmetric submarine hull in translation[R]. DRDC Atlantic TM 2006-037, Canada, 2006.
[7] SUNG-EUN Kim, BONG Jae Rhee, RONALD W. Miller Anatomy of turbulent flow around DARPA SUBOFF body in a turning maneuver using high-fidelity RANS computations[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2013, 60: 207–231
[8] TOXOPEUS S.L., ATSAVAPRANEE P., et al. Collaborative CFD exercise for a submarine in a steady turn[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012.
[9] PHILLIPS A B, TURNOCK S R, FURLONG M. Influence of turbulence closure models on the vortical flow field around a submarine body undergoing steady drift[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2010, 15(3): 201–217
[10] 柏铁朝, 梁中刚, 周轶美, 等. 潜艇操纵性水动力数值计算中湍流模式的比较与运用[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2010, 2: 22–28
[11] TOXOPEUS, S.L Viscous-flow calculations for bare hull DARPA SUBOFF submarine at incidence[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 2008, 55(3): 227–251
[12] VAZ. G., TOXOPEUS S.L., HOLMES, S. Calculation of manoeuvring forces on submarines using two viscous-flow solvers[C]//29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Shanghai, China, 2010, 621-633.
[13] FUREBY C, ANDERSON B, CLARKE D, et al. Experimental and numerical study of a generic conventional submarine at 10° yaw[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 116: 1–20
[14] BOGER D, DREYER J. Prediction of hydrodynamic forces and moments for underwater vehicles using overset grids[C]. Proc 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, 2006: 9-12.
[15] ZAGHI S, Di MASCIO A, BROGLIA R, et al. Application of dynamic overlapping grids to the simulation of the flow around a fully-appended submarine[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2015, 116: 75–88
[16] 孙铭泽, 王永生, 杨琼方. 潜艇操纵性数值模拟中雷诺数的影响分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2012, 11: 1334–1340
[17] ZHANG J.T., MAXWELL J A, et al Simulation of the flow over axisymmetric submarine hulls in steady turning[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 57: 180–196
[18] HOLLOWAY A.G.L., JEANS T.L., WATT G.D. Flow separation from submarine shaped bodies of revolution in steady turning[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 108: 426–438
[19] MUSTAFA C. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic planar motion mechanism test for underwater vehicles numerical[M]. Middle East Technical University, Turkey, 2014.
[20] RACINE, B.J. PATERSON E.G.. CFD-based method for simulation of marine vehicle maneuvering[C]//35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2005.
[21] PAN Yucun, ZHANG Huaixin, ZHOU Qidou. Numerical prediction of submarine hydrodynamic coefficients using CFD simulation[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(6): 840–847
[22] Yucun PAN, Qidou ZHOU, Huaixin ZHANG. Numerical simulation of rotating arm test for prediction of submarine rotary derivatives[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(1): 68–75
[23] 肖昌润, 刘瑞杰, 许可, 等. 潜艇旋臂回转试验数值模拟[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 4: 313–316
[24] Liushuai CAO, Jun ZHU, Wenbin WAN. Numerical investigation of submarine hydrodynamics and flow field in steady turn[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2016, 30(1): 57–68
[25] CAO Liushuai, ZHU Jun, ZENG Guanghui. Viscous-flow calculations of submarine maneuvering hydrodynamic coefficients and flow field based on same grid topology[J]. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 9(2): 817–826
[26] VENKATESAN G., CLARK W. . Submarine maneuvering simulations of ONR Body 1[C]//In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE, San Diego, California, USA, 2007.
[27] AMIRI M. M., ESPERANCA P. T., VITOLA M. A., et al How does the free surface affect the hydrodynamics of a shallowly submerged submarine?[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2018, 76: 34–50
[28] BETTLE, M. Unsteady computational fluid dynamics simulations of six degrees of freedom submarine manoeuvres[D]. University of New Brunswick, Canada, 2013.
[29] POREMBA J. E.. Hydrodynamics and maneuvering simulations of a non-body-of-revolution submarine[M]. The Pennsylvania State University, 2009.
[30] ESMAEILPOUR M, MARTIN J. E, CARRICA P.M. Near-field flow of submarines and ships advancing in a stable stratified fluid[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 123: 75–95
[31] WANG Zhilin, DONG Zhenwei, HE Ran, et al. Numerical simulation of submarine surfacing with 6 DOF model in the ocean current effect[C]//26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 2016.
[32] JIANG Weijian, WANG Zhilin, HE Ran, et al, Dakui FENG. Numerical simulation of submarine surfacing with six degrees of freedom in regular waves[C]//Proceedings of the ASME.35th International Conference on Ocean Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea, 2016.
[33] FENG Dakui, CHEN Xuanshu, LIU Hao, et al. Comparisons of turning abilities of submarine with different rudder configurations[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 2018.
[34] HOWAN Kim, DEV Ranmuthugala, et al. Six-DOF simulations of an underwater vehicle undergoing straight line and steady turning manoeuvres[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 150: 102–112
[35] POREMBA J. E.. Hydrodynamics and Maneuvering Simulations of a Non-Body-of-Revolution Submarine[M]. The Pennsylvania State University, 2009.
[36] LIEFVENDAHL M., TROËNG C.. Simulation based analysis of the hydrodynamics and load fluctuations of a submarine propeller behind a fully appended submarine hull[C]//29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2012.
[37] NATHAN C.. Simulations of the DARPA Suboff submarine including self-propulsion with the E1619 propeller[R]. University of Iowa, USA, 2012.
[38] NATHAN C., CARRICA P. M. Submarine propeller computations and application to self-propulsion of DARPA suboff[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 60: 68–80
[39] MARTIN J. E, MICHAEL T, CARRICA P M Submarine maneuvers using direct overset simulation of appendages and propeller and coupled CFD/potential flow propeller solver[J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2015, 59(1): 31–48
[40] CARRICA P.M., KERKVLIET M., et al. CFD simulations and experiments of a maneuvering generic submarine and prognosis for simulation of near surface operation[C]//31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Monterey, CA, 2016.
[41] BROGLIA R., Di MASCIO A., MUSCARI R. Numerical study of confined water effects on a self-propelled submarine in steady manoeuvres[J]. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2007, 17(2): 89–96
[42] DUBBIOSO G., BROGLIA R., ZAGHI S. CFD analysis of turning abilities of a submarine model[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 129: 459–479
