选取4种典型隔振器为对象，垂向或侧挂安装在船舶通海管路系统中，采用跟踪仪等设备在3个不同阶段测量了隔振器在X，Y，Z三个方向的变形情况。测试结果表明，在设备安装后管路安装前，隔振器变形均不大；在管路刚安装完成时，隔振器在X，Y，Z三个方向均会发生明显的拉伸或压缩变形，在系统运行阶段，隔振器变形在X，Y，Z三个方向均无明显变化。因此，在管路安装过程中，应严格控制管路安装外力，避免隔振器出现异常变形、降低其隔振效果。
The four types of typical vibration isolators were chosen as the objects, they were installed vertically or in side at the sea pipeline, the deformation in X, Y, Z directions for vibration isolators were measured at three stages by tracking instrument and other instruments. The results showed that the vibration isolators deformed little after equipment was installed but pipeline not. The vibration isolators were stretched or constricted obviously in all X, Y, Z directions when pipelines were installed. It showed that the pipeline installation had little effect on deformation of vibration isolators. At the system operation stage, the deformation of vibration isolators had no obvious change in X, Y, Z directions. Therefore, during pipeline installation, the external force should be controlled satirically to avoid abnormal deformation of vibration isolator and reduce vibration isolation effect.
2020,42(6): 61-64 收稿日期：2019-09-17
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2020.06.012
分类号：U674.941
基金项目：国防科工局基础科研“十三五”专项
作者简介：贾晓丹(1982-),女,硕士,高级工程师,研究方向为船体结构减振降噪
参考文献：
[1] 徐建龙, 张盛, 潘国雄, 等. 舷侧阀通海口结构形式对声学性能的影响[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2016, 11(2):90-97
[2] 许锐, 徐建龙, 郭宁. 隔振器不同安装工艺对浮筏声学性能的影响[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2014(8):98-103
[3] 尹志勇, 孙志东. 一种船舶液态管路系统振动频域响应预报方法[J]. 船舶力学, 2013, 17(11):1352-1360
[4] 王育平, 彭旭. 船舶通海管路系统振动的理论与试验分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2004(6):18-21
[5] 胡泽超, 何琳, 李彦. 隔振器分布对浮筏隔振系统隔振性能的影响[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(11):48-52
[6] 谢耀国, 曲先强, 崔洪斌, 等. 船用振动隔振器性能研究[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2015, 32(10):46-50
[7] 张生乐. 隔振设备与管路安装工序及静置时间对隔振系统变形影响研究报告[R]. 武汉:武昌船舶重工集团有限公司, 2018.
