为了优化水面舰船总体性能，开展舰船总体方案多目标综合评估方法研究，对待选方案进行多目标综合评估，可为方案的选择提供理论依据。对各综合评估方法的原理、特点及其在舰船评估领域的研究现状、发展前景等进行简要梳理，在此基础上，重点根据舰船方案评估的特点和熵权法的不足对其数学模型进行改进，与理想点法相结合，提出具有客观性且适用于舰船方案评估的熵权理想点综合评估法，并引入实例进行计算、分析和验证。研究结果表明，提出的熵权理想点法在舰船方案评估领域具有可行性和有效性。
Warships general is an extremely complex integrated system, in order to make the general scheme, it is necessary to weigh each multi-objectives, analyse and evaluate the scheme set, and provide theoretical evidence for decision-making. This paper researched and analyzed the principle, characteristics about synthesis assessment methods, summarized the applicability, application and development prospect of these methods in the warships assessment field. Selective analyses focus on the improvement of the entropy-weight method’s mathematical model according to its shortage. Combined the entropy-weight method with TOPSIS, put forward entropy weighting ideal point comprehensive evaluation method and then give an example to calculate, analyse and verify this new mothed. Discussed its effectiveness and feasibility in the field of warship schemes’ evaluation.
2021,43(1): 17-22 收稿日期：2019-10-28
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2021.01.003
分类号：U662.2
基金项目：装备预研基金资助项目(6141B06274)；工信部高技术船舶科研项目(工信部联装[2016]548号)
作者简介：胡开业(1980-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向为舰船总体性能
参考文献：
[1] REED, MICHEAL R. Ship synthesis model for naval surface[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1976.
[2] LCdr, C, A, Whitcomb. Naval ship design philosophy implememtation[J]. Naval Engineers Journal, 1998: 49-55
[3] 吕建伟, 王新磊, 曾宏军. 海军舰船设计方案的评估方法研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2006, 1(1): 21-24
LU Jian-wei, WANG Xin-lei, ZENG Hong-jun. Research on the assessment methodology for design alternatives of navy vessels[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2006, 1(1): 21-24
[4] 张恒, 冯伟强. 水面舰艇流体性能关键技术评估方法研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(13): 21-25
ZHANG Heng, FENG Wei-qiang. Research on integrated evaluation method for fluid performance technology of surface warship[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2016, 38(13): 21-25
[5] 吕世韬, 金涛, 曹杰. 水面舰船综合生命力评估方法研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2011, 33(2): 126-130
LV Shi-tao, JIN Tao, CAO Jie. The integrated assessment method research of ship survivability[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2011, 33(2): 126-130
[6] 周大伟, 许辉, 赵海江, 等. 舰船主尺度论证中的多目标综合评估[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2011, 6(6): 71-74
ZHOU Da-wei, XU Hui, ZHAO Hai-jiang, et al. Multi-objective synthesized evaluation in principal dimensions design of ship[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2011, 6(6): 71-74
[7] JUSTIN STEPANCHICK, ALAN BROWN, Revisiting DDGX/DDG-51 concept exploration[J]. Naval Engineers Journal[J]. 2007, 119(3): 67-88,.
[8] 王健, 陈立. 舰船总布置中的综合评估模型及其应用研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2010, 5(1): 19-23+38
WANG Jian, CHEN Li. Comprehensive assessment model and its application to general arrangement of ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1): 19-23+38
[9] 丛 琳, 魏汝祥, 谢俊杰. 基于模糊AHP和D-S理论的舰船设计质量评估方法研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2009, 4(4): 52-55
CONG Lin, WEI Ru-xiang, XIE Jun-jie. Evaluation method of ship design quality based on fuzzy AHP and D-S Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(4): 52-55
[10] 李学斌, 甘霖. 舰船概念设计多目标优化和多属性决策研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2008, 3(3): 14-17+33
LI Xue-bin, GAN Lin. Multi-objective optimization and multi-attribute decision making study of naval ship S conceptual design[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2008, 3(3): 14-17+33
[11] 孙多青, 霍伟. 基于规则灵敏度的模糊逻辑系统结构简化方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2002, 28(2): 198-201
SUN Duo-qing, HUO Wei. A method to simplify fuzzy logic system structure[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002, 28(2): 198-201
[12] 孙多青. 不确定系统的模糊自适应控制与辨识新方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2002: 15−23.
