为解决装甲车进出坞舱过程中的打滑、侧移问题，对装甲车与坞舱甲板湿摩擦接触面滑移运动过程进行理论分析，确定了装甲车装载过程中所需要的临界滑动摩擦系数；根据装甲车进出坞舱运动状态及衬垫服役环境，完成了衬垫结构设计，在考虑多种影响因素下，制备了16组衬垫试样进行摩擦性能测试，依此确定了最优衬垫方案，其湿摩擦系数可达0.87，质量磨损量为0.284 g。
In order to solve the problem of slipping and side movement during the process of armored vehicles entering and exiting the docking bay, this paper conducts a theoretical analysis of the sliding motion process of the wet friction contact surface between the armored vehicle and the docking bay deck, and determines the critical sliding friction coefficient required during the loading process of the armored vehicle. According to the movement state of the armored vehicle in and out of the dock and the service environment of the liner, the liner structure design was completed. After considering various influencing factors, 16 sets of liner samples were prepared for friction performance testing, and the optimal liner plan was determined accordingly. Its wet friction coefficient can reach 0.87, and the mass wear amount is 0.284 g.
2022,44(8): 6-11 收稿日期：2021-04-25
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2022.08.002
分类号：TB332
作者简介：柴崧淋(1997-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为舰船抗爆抗冲击
参考文献：
[1] 李晓文. 新型坞载登陆艇概念设计研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2012.
[2] 孙丽娜. 大型构件海上运输安全性分析[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2006.
[3] 唐世友. 船舶载运特大型车辆的系固研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学, 2012.
[4] 宋世红, 张学卿. 防滑涂料概论[J]. 中国涂料, 2009, 24(7):60-63
SONG Shi-hong, ZHANG Xue-qing. Introduction to anti-slip coatings[J]. China Paint, 2009, 24(7):60-63
[5] 仲晓萍. 我国特种涂料发展现状及未来趋势[J]. 现代化工, 2019, 39(12):7-10
ZHONG Xiao-ping. Development status and future trends of my country's special coatings[J]. Modern Engineering, 2019, 39(12):7-10
[6] 邓琦, 王同良, 白杨, 等. 高耐磨甲板防滑涂层的制备及其性能研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2020, 15(4):82-88
DENG Qi, WANG Tong-liang, BAI Yang, et al. Preparation and performance of anti-skid coating for high wear-resistant deck[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2020, 15(4):82-88
[7] 宋振伟, 白杨, 姜秀杰, 等. 甲板防滑涂层去除技术的研究现状[J]. 涂料工业, 2020, 50(9):82-87
SONG Zhen-wei, BAI Yang, JIANG Xiu-jie,et al. Research status of anti-skid coating removal technology on deck[J]. Paint Industry, 2020, 50(9):82-87
[8] 曹卫锋. 车辆动载作用下长大上坡沥青路面力学响应研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2014.
[9] 邵清波. 纵坡工况下汽车轨迹预测算法的研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2015.
[10] 杨守威. 装载重大件货物系固方式研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2010.
[11] 王兆麒. 驳运重大件货物系固绑扎方案安全校核方法研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2016.
[12] 陈益平, 刘宝新, 袁沐. 船载货物的惯性力研究[J]. 军事交通学院学报, 2019, 21(1):90-94
CHEN Yi-ping, LIU Bao-xin, YUAN Mu. Research on the inertial force of ship cargo[J]. Journal of the Academy of Military Transportation, 2019, 21(1):90-94
[13] 邓琦, 徐金文, 高新华, 等. 舰船甲板防滑涂料技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2013, 8(2):111-116
DENG Qi, XU Jin-wen, GAO Xin-hua, et al. The status quo and development trend of anti-skid coating technology on ship deck[J]. China Ship Research, 2013, 8(2):111-116
[14] 曾飞, 钱艳峰, 胡凯强, 等. 粉煤灰基防滑粒料的改性及其应用研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2019, 47(7):222-225+231
ZENG Fei, QIAN Yan-feng, HU Kai-qiang,et al. Modification and application of fly ash-based anti-skid pellets[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2019, 47(7):222-225+231
[15] 江林峰, 陈雷, 李一新. Al2O3防滑粒料对防滑涂层防滑及磨损性能的影响[J]. 涂料工业, 2014, 44(1):6-11
JIANG Lin-feng, CHEN Lei, LI Yi-xin. The influence of Al2O3 anti-skid pellets on the anti-skid and wear properties of anti-skid coatings[J]. Paint Industry, 2014, 44(1):6-11
[16] 王树源, 李晏, 张毅科. 混凝土正交试验结果极差分析与方差分析方法对比[J]. 建材发展导向, 2016, 14(12):44-48
WANG Shu-yuan, LI Yan, ZHANG Yi-ke. Comparison of range analysis and variance analysis of concrete orthogonal test results[J]. Building Materials Development Orientation, 2016, 14(12):44-48
[17] 范步高. 正交试验方差分析的Excel通用计算与应用[J]. 中国医药工业杂志, 2011, 42(10):793-795
FAN Bu-gao. General calculation and application of Excel for analysis of variance of orthogonal experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical, 2011, 42(10):793-795
