对航母作战能力毁伤评估的准确性取决于其毁伤判据的合理性，因此展开航空保障系统关键作业流程的参数分析及其毁伤的定量计算，研究其毁伤对判定航母作战能力的舰载机架次的影响。以“尼米兹”级航母为研究对象，通过分析飞行、保障作业流程，获得各类作业的关键参数及其影响权重。同时，基于闭式系统排队的概念，结合关键参数及定性分析结果，建立“尼米兹”级航母舰载机保障、出动、回收的仿真模型。最后，仿真计算得出各类保障作业对舰载机出动架次的影响特性。研究结果表明，毁伤燃油补给、弹射功能对舰载机架次影响不大，冗余性弱的回收作业是整体保障作业的薄弱环节，舰载机出动架次与弹药补给服务点数、服务时间密切相关。
The accuracy of damage assessment of aircraft carrier combat capability depends on the rationality of its damage criterion. Therefore, the parameter analysis of crucial operation process of aviation support system and the quantitative calculation of damage are carried out to study the impact of its damage on the sorties order to determine the aircraft carrier combat capability. Firstly, taking the Nimitz class aircraft carrier as the research object, the key parameters and their influence weights of various operations are obtained by analyzing the flight and support operation processes. At the same time, based on the concept of closed system queuing, combined with the key parameters and qualitative analysis results, the simulation model of carrier borne aircraft support, launch and recovery of Nimitz class aircraft carrier is established. Finally, the influence characteristics of various support operations on carrier aircraft sorties are obtained by simulation. The results show that the damage of fuel supply and catapult function has little effect on the sorties, the recovery operation with weak redundancy is the weak link of the overall support operation, and the sorties of aircraft are closely related to the number of ordnance supply service stations and time.
2022,44(11): 185-189 收稿日期：2021-09-25
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2022.11.039
分类号：U674.771
作者简介：张磊(1974-)，男，高级工程师，研究方向为舰船毁伤与防护
参考文献：
[1] 徐峰, 周心桃, 李德聪, 等. 国外典型航母目标特性探析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2018, 40(17): 155–161
XU Feng, ZHOU Xin-tao, LI De-cong, et al. Analysis of the target characteristics of foreign typical aircraft carrier[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2018, 40(17): 155–161
[2] F-22 aircraft progress in achieving engineering and manufacturing development goals [R]. GAO/NSIAD-98-67, 1998.
[3] 王玮, 颜世伟. 美国航母舰载机出动回收能力评估方法[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(7): 144–146
WANG Wei, YAN Shi-wei. Analysis one valuation method of SGR of US aircraft carrier[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2016, 38(7): 144–146
[4] 刘相春. 美国“福特”级航母“一站式保障”技术特征和关键技术分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2013, 8(6): 1–5
LIU Xiang-chun. Technical features and critical technologies for the"Pit-Stop"aircraft servicing adopted by ford class aircraft carriers[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(6): 1–5
[5] 李景熹. 美国航母飞行甲板演变及设计思想研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2017, 039(6): 153–157
LI Jing-xi. Research on the design philosophy and evolution of the U. S. aircraft carrier flight deck[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2017, 039(6): 153–157
[6] 杨茂胜, 毕玉泉, 黄葵, 等. MK7-3型阻拦装置定长冲跑控制阀结构特点及控制规律[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2012, 34(3): 140–143
YANG Mao-sheng, BI Yu-quan, HUANG Kui, et al. Analysis on structure character and control rule of the constant runout valve for MK7-3 arresting gear[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2012, 34(3): 140–143
[7] 希弦. 微观航母之升降机[J]. 兵器知识, 2015(12): 68–73
XI Xian. Aircraft carrier elevator[J]. Ordnance Knowledge, 2015(12): 68–73
[8] 杨炳恒, 韩峰, 王海东, 等. 舰载机机库调运作业路径[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2012(8): 141–143
YANG Bing-heng, HAN Feng, WANG Hai-dong, et al. Research on aircraft handling workflow path[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2012(8): 141–143
[9] 史文强, 李彦庆, 陈练. 航空母舰飞行甲板作业及弹药转运系统分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2012(3): 13–18
SHI Wen-qiang, LI Yan-qing, CHEN Lian. Flight deck operations and ordnance handling aboard aircraft carrier[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2012(3): 13–18
[10] 孟祥印. 飞行甲板总布置设计中的若干问题研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2011.
[11] 杨放青. 航母飞行甲板作业能力分析与优化研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学.
[12] 李新其, 张欧亚, 王明海. 子母弹对舰载机作战保障系统毁伤计算分析方法[J]. 弹道学报, 2008(3): 59–63
LI Xin-qi, ZHANG Ou-ya, WANG Ming-hai. Damage effectiveness analysis on operational guarantee system of carrier aircraft under attack of submunition[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2008(3): 59–63
[13] 李新其, 向爱红, 李红霞. 系统目标毁伤效果评估问题研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(1): 57–62
LI Xin-qi, XIANG Ai-hong, LI Hong-xia. Calculation and assessment on damage effect of system target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(1): 57–62
[14] 胡慧, 袁震宇, 谢春思, 等. 基于毁伤树构建系统目标毁伤评估模型研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2010(8): 32–35
HU Hui, YUAN Zhen-yu, XIE Chun-si, et al. Research on constructing damage assessment model of system target based on the function tree[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2010(8): 32–35
[15] JEWELL A . Sortie generation capacity of embarked airwings[ J]. sortie generation capacity of embarked airwings, 1998.
[16] JEWELL A , WIGGE M A , GAGNON C M , et al. USS Nimitz and carrier airwing nine surge demonstration[J]. Uss Nimitz & Carrier Airwing Nine Surge Demonstration, 1998.
[17] 刘相春, 卢晶, 黄祥钊. 国外航母舰载机出动回收能力指标体系分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2011(4): 1–7
LIU Xiang-chun, LU Jing, HUANG Xiang-zhao. Analysis on the index system of sortie generation capacity of embarked aircrafts[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2011(4): 1–7
[18] JEWELL A, et al. CVW Sortie Generation [R]. Confidential, 1995.
[19] Naval Air Engineering Center (NAEC) 06900. Aircraft Carrier Reference Data Manual, Unclassified, [R].1994.
[20] Informal communications, Carrier Flight Operations Data [R]. Robert Ward and Henry Herz, Confidential, 1984.
