为探究迎浪和斜浪中船首形状对于波浪增阻的影响，本文在只改变船首的情况下，首先利用三维时域Rankine源方法对分别装有5种典型船首的某超大型集装箱船的波浪增阻和周围流场变化进行研究，其次开展直艏下沉深度（直艏底部距离基线的高度）对波浪增阻影响的研究。结果表明，斧型艏和直艏由于其半进流角较小等特征，其减阻性能最优。直艏和斧型艏相较于飞剪艏和前倾艏，其波浪增阻系数可以减小20%左右。直艏下沉深度在长波区和短波区呈现相反的减阻性能，在长波区，直艏下沉深度越大，波浪增阻系数越小，其下沉深度增大6 m可减小波浪增阻10%；在短波区则相反。
To explore the influence of bow shape on added resistance in head and oblique waves, firstly, the added resistance and surrounding flow field variation of a very large container ship with five typical bows were studied by using the three-dimensional time-domain Rankine source method. Secondly the effect of the height of the erect bow base from the baseline on the added resistance is studied. The results show that the axe bow and the erect bow have the best drag reduction performance due to their smaller entrance angle. Compared with clipper bow and raked bow, the added resistance coefficient of erect bow and axe bow can be reduced by about 20%. In the long-wavelength region, the greater the sinking depth of the erect bow, the smaller the added resistance coefficient, and the greater the sinking depth of 6 m can reduce the added resistance coefficient by 10%. The opposite is true in the short-wavelength region.
2024,46(16): 27-33 收稿日期：2023-10-12
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2024.16.005
分类号：U661.32
基金项目：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
作者简介：谢千慧（1999 – ），女，硕士，研究方向为船舶耐波性和波浪增阻
参考文献：
[1] IMO. Prevention of air pollution from ships[S]. MEPC 57, London, UK, 2008.
[2] FALTINSEN O M. Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway[C]//13th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, 1980: 505-529.
[3] YAMASAKI K, MATSUMOTO K, TAKAGISHI K. On the bow shape of full ships with low speed. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers[J]. 2003; 240: 101–108.
[4] KURODA M, TSUJIMOTO M, FUJIWARA T, et al. Investigation on components of added resistance in short waves[J]. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 2008, 8: 171-176.
[5] KIM Y, Seo M G, PARK D M, et al. Numerical and experimental analyses of added resistance in waves[C]//Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Osaka, Japan. 2014.
[6] LEE C M, YU J W, CHOI J E, et al. Effect of bow hull forms on the resistance performance in calm water and waves for 66k DWT bulk carrier[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2019, 11(2): 723-735.
[7] YASUKAWA H, MASARU T. Impact of bow shape on added resistance of a full hull ship in head waves[J]. Ship Technology Research, 2020, 67(3): 136-147.
[8] LE T K, HE N V, HIEN N V, et al. Effects of a bulbous bow shape on added resistance acting on the hull of a ship in regular head wave[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(6): 559-563.
[9] VALANTO P, HONG Y P. Experimental investigation on ship wave added resistance in regular head, oblique, beam, and following waves[C]//ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, ISOPE, 2015.
[10] FERREIRA M D A S. Second-order steady forces on floating bodies with forward speed[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997.
[11] PAN Z, VADA T, HAN K. Computation of wave added resistance by control surface integration[C]//International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016.
[12] KRING D C. Time domain ship motions by a three-dimensional Rankine panel method[D]. Massachusetts institute of technology, 1994.
