针对近年美国海军围绕潜艇自救保障能力建设需求,在潜艇自救装备领域研发出现的新变化,通过采用文献综合分析方法,以报警示位装备、快速上浮脱险装备、应急生命支持装备为切入,对美国海军潜艇自救装备发展现状进行系统分析。分析归纳了上述3类美国海军潜艇自救装备的发展趋势,结合我国海军潜艇自救装备发展实际,对比美国海军技术,提出我国要开展以匹配潜艇兵力行动为目标的潜艇自救装备技术研发与升级体系构建等具体结论。
In recent years, the United States (US) navy has developed new changes in the field of submarine escape equipment around the needs of submarine escape support capability building, though adopting the method of comprehensive literature analysis, the present situation of US navy submarines’ escape equipment development is analyzed from alerting and position indication equipment, tower escape equipment and emergency life support equipment, then according to the analysis, the development trend of the above three types of equipment is summarized, finally based on the actual development of Chinese navy submarine escape equipment and compared with the technology of the US navy, the paper puts forward specific conclusions such as the research and development of submarine escape equipment technology and the construction of upgrade system to match the submarine force action.
2025,47(6): 184-189 收稿日期:2024-5-20
DOI:10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2025.06.032
分类号:U676.8
基金项目:海军潜艇学院青年科研基金项目(24QJ0503)
作者简介:钟后阳(1988 – ),男,硕士,副教授,研究方向为外军援潜救生、深潜救生艇技术与运用等
参考文献:
[1] RONALD O'ROURKE. Navy force structure and shipbuilding plans: background and issues for congress[M]. Washington D. C. U. S: The Congressional Research Service, 2022.
[2] 孙卫华, 费礼, 叶发新. 潜艇应急救生通信现状及发展趋势[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(12): 16-19.
SUN W H, FEI L, YE F X. Current situation and development trend of emergency communication for rescuing submarine in danger[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2016, 38(12): 16-19.
[3] STEPHANIE M. MOHUNDRO, SARA J N. Disabled submarine escape and rescue considerations[C]// 49th International Conference on Environment Systems. Boston Massachusetts US, 2019.
[4] RICH S. Report of the 2019 meeting of the submarine escape and rescue working group[M]. Chania Greece: NATO Military Committee Maritime Standardization Board, 2019.
[5] RICHARD S, DAVID R, MICHAEL D. US navy submarine rescue system decompression plan[M]. Washington DC US: US Naval Sea Systems Command, 2020.
[6] DAVID M F, CHRISTOPHER S F, LINDA M H. Buoyant ascent rate profiles for the MK10 and MK11 submarine escape and immersion equipment[J]. Undersea & Hyperbaric Medicine, 2023, 50(4): 343-358.
[7] EDVARDAS M. The submarine search and rescue manual national data[M]. Brussels Belgium: NATO Military Committee Maritime Standardization Board, 2017.
[8] INGE R. Report of the 2023 meeting of the submarine escape and rescue working group[M]. Venice Italy: NATO Military Committee Maritime Standardization Board, 2023.
[9] JOÃO A R, PETROCCIA A, GRATIETC. A paradigm shift for interoperable submarine rescue operations: The Usage of JANUS During the Dynamic Monarch 2017 Exercise[C]// MTS/IEEE OCEANS’18. Kobe Japan, 2018.
[10] JOÃO A J, FRICKE. Analysis of JANUS and underwater telephone capabilities and co-existence[C]// In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE OES International Conference on Underwater Communications and Networking, ser. UComms16. Lerici Italy, 2016.
[11] JOHN P, JOÃO A, DALE G, et al. The JANUS underwater communications standard[C]// IEEE OES UComms 14 Underwater Communications Networking Conference. Sestri Levante Italy, 2014.
[12] US NAVSEA. USN submarine escape trunks (Towers)[C]// SMERWG TECH Panel 2015. Garmish Partenkirchen Germany, 2015.
[13] US NAVSEA. USN Escape, rescue, and survivability[C]// SMERWG TECH Panel 2018. Amsterdam Netherlands, 2018.
[14] US NAVSEA. Naval ship’s technical manual chapter 594 submarine search and rescue[M]. Washington DC US: US Naval Sea Systems Command, 2007.
[15] HALE H. Hood inflation system[C]// SMERWG TECH Panel 2018. Amsterdam Netherlands, 2018.
[16] US Navy Undersea Rescue Command. USA URC status brief[C]// The 2022 Meeting of SMERWG. Amsterdam Netherlands, 2022.
[17] US Navy Undersea Rescue Command. US submarine rescue capability update[C]// SMERWG TECH Panel 2023. Garmisch Partenkirchen Germany, 2023.
[18] 王兴超, 国德旺, 王雅娟, 等. 国外海军事故潜艇中二氧化碳清除技术[J]. 舰船防化, 2014(3): 8-12.
WANG X C, GUO D W, WANG Y J, et al. Carbon dioxide scrubbing technologies for use in DISSUB abroad[J]. Chemical Defence on Ships, 2014(3): 8-12.
[19] 李俊华, 焦桂萍, 邓辉, 等. 潜艇大气环境控制关键技术研究现状与展望[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2014, 3: 8-12.
LI J H, JIAO G P, DENG H, et al. Development and prospects of key technology for submarine atmospheric environment control[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(5): 116-124.
[20] HYUN M B. Possibility of military service-regeneration of LiOH for submarines and improvement in CO2 scrubbing performance of LiOH canisters[J]. Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology, 2022, 46(3): 115-121.
[21] MARZIYEH A, AHAD G, MOHAMMAD Q. Lithium hydroxide as a high capacity adsorbent for CO2 capture: experimental, modeling and DFT simulation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023(13): 1-18.