针对舰载机使用保障过程中的强约束、不确定性等特征，首先以作战任务、保障对象以及保障系统的作用机理为依据，设计舰载机通用质量特性指标论证的流程。运用解析和离散事件仿真的方法，构建基于任务和故障驱动的舰载机保障流程仿真模型。其次，采用循环迭代的方式对舰载机的通用质量特性指标进行论证，以使用可用度和任务成功率指标为约束分别对可靠度和故障预测率进行逆向灵敏度分析。算例结果表明，设计方法科学可行，可以实现通用质量特性指标的优化论证。本文方法可为舰载机质量特性指标的正向设计提供技术支持。
The process of carrier-based aircraft support is characteristics of strong constraints and uncertainties, according to the active mechanism of the missions, support objects and support system, the benchmark methods of universal quality characteristic indicators for carrier-based aircraft is designed, which was used by analysis and discrete event simulation method. A simulation framework of carrier-based aircraft support process driven by mission and faults is constructed, and the universal quality characteristic indicators of carrier-based aircraft are demonstrated in a cyclic and iterative manner. Through two examples, taking reliability and failure prediction rate as universal quality characteristic indicators variable, the operation availability and mission success rate are reversed to improve the equipment support effective. Sensitivity analysis and calculation example results suggest that the present method is scientific and feasible, and can realize the optimization demonstration of the universal quality characteristic indicators. Further more, the research method can provide technical support for the positive index design of the universal quality characteristic index of carrier-based aircraft.
2023,45(8): 185-189 收稿日期：2022-06-25
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2023.08.037
分类号：E926.392
基金项目：中国博士后科学基金资助项目（2019M653929）；山东省自然科学基金资助项目 (ZR201910310210)
作者简介：祝华远(1975-),男,博士,教授,研究方向为舰载机综合保障
参考文献：
[1] 屈也频, 金惠明, 何肇雄. 航母舰载机装备体系及指标论证方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 113–124
[2] 丁定浩. 论证军用装备 RMS 顶层参数指标的意义和建议[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2011, 29(5): 1–5
[3] 祝华远, 李军亮, 贾向军, 等. 航空装备通用质量特性概论[M]. 航空工业出版社, 北京, 2021, 01
[4] 李军亮, 滕克难, 夏菲. 一种复杂可修系统的可用度计算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(12): 150–158
[5] 李军亮, 陈跃良, 张勇, 等. 基于可用度的预防性维修周期优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(6): ;1611–1624
[6] LI J L, CHEN Y L, ZHANG Y, et al. Availability modelling for periodically inspected systems under mixed maintenance policies[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(3): 722–731
[7] 韩维, 李正阳, 苏析超, 等. 航母航空保障效能评估综述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(7): 2586–2594
[8] 刘东, 吴家仁, 周一舟, 等. 舰载机综合保障技术实践及发展展望[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 106−123.
[9] 丁善婷, 王淼, 董正琼, 等. 基于多智能体的舰船装备健康状态仿真评估方法[J]. 中国机械工程，2022, 33(10): 1169−1177.
[10] 张豪, 郑茂, 初秀民, 等. 舰载机高强度作业流程仿真研究[J]. 舰船科学与技术, 2019, 41(6): 147–153
ZHANG H, ZEHNG M, CHU X M, et al. Carrier-based aircraft surge operation simulation based on linear index policies[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2019, 41(6): 147–153
[11] 崔利杰, 丛继平, 丁刚, 等. 基于不确定性的航空装备体系保障性评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(12): 2452–2461
CUI L J, CONG J P, DING G, et al. Supportability evaluation of aviation equipment system based on uncertainty[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(12): 2452–2461
[12] 潘星, 左督军, 张跃东. 基于系统动力学的装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 112–120
[13] 杨鹏, 邱静, 刘冠军, 等. 一种基于ROM模型的测试性指标论证方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 273–286
