为了研究多航态高速无人艇在不同吃水航态下的阻力性能以及运动特性，在半潜到水面航态范围内变换6个吃水状态进行模型阻力试验，试验速度涵盖排水航行到滑行状态范围，对每个吃水工况下的航行姿态、阻力性能进行分析研究。结果表明，该多航态高速无人艇在一定吃水范围内都有着较好的阻力性能以及良好的运动姿态，在中低速（Fr∇ < 2.0）条件下，该模型在不同吃水下的运动姿态、阻力性能随航速的变化趋势一致，但在高速滑行（Fr∇ >3.0）条件下变化趋势有差异；剩余阻力占总阻力的比例Rr/Rt随着吃水的增加而不断增大，在相同吃水条件下Rr/Rt随着Fr∇$的增加呈现出先增大后减小的规律。
In order to study the resistance and motion characters of the multi-navigation high-speed craft under different draft conditions, a series of towing resistance model tests were conducted by changing draught conditions from semi-submerged state to surface-navigation, the test speed covers the drainage sailing state to high speed planing condition. The sailing state and resistance characters of different draft condition was studied. The results show that this craft has good resistance characters and good movement posture within a certain range of draught. With the Fr∇ < 2.0 condition, the trend of movement attitude and resistance performance are the same under different draught conditions, though they show difference under the Fr∇ >3.0 condition.The ratio of residual resistance to the total resistance Rr/Rt increases with the draught. Under the same draught conditions, Rr/Rt shows a trend that increases first and then diminishes with the increase of Fr∇.
2019,41(12): 58-63 收稿日期：2018-07-19
DOI：10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2019.12.013
分类号：U661.33
作者简介：罗富强(1993-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为舰船流体动力性能
参考文献：
[1] 林龙信, 张比升. 水面无人作战系统技术发展与作战应用[J]. 水下无人作战系统学报, 2018, 26(2): 107–114
[2] BEECH. Dolphin safe rescuer[J]. Safety at Sea International, 1999(4): 18–19
[3] 王伟. 多航态无人航行器概念设计及水动力性能分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2016: 2–5.
[4] 孟庆国, 田正东. 国外海军新概念舰艇研究综述[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2011(5): 137–144
[5] 董文才, 岳国强, 侯亚成, 等. 高速艇自由变深水动力试验研究[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2006(1): 57–62-13
[6] 霍聪, 董文才. 潜伏式高速无人船型变航态航行试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2016(8): 1180–1185
[7] 霍聪, 董文才. 潜伏式高速船型变航态自航数值模拟[J]. 船舶工程, 2016(3): 26–30
[8] 董祖舜. 快艇动力学[M]. 武汉, 华中理工大学出版社, 1988: 20–25.
[9] 王志东, 凌杰, 吴娜, 等. 滑行艇喷溅阻力特性模型试验研究[J]. 江苏科技大学(自然科学版), 2015(4): 317–323
[10] 吴娜. 高速滑行艇喷溅阻力的数值计算与分析方法研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏科技大学, 2015: 48–53.
[11] CLEMENT E. P., BLOUNT D. L. Resistance tests of a systematic series of planning hull forms[J]. SNAME, 1963, 71: 542–551.
